jkays94
07-10 08:35 AM
Nothing - this thread may not have merit. Please close this thread
It has limited relevance, the issue is the integrity of the Senator, he has admitted to the issue at hand but he went on the Senate floor as an elected public official to make declaratory and restrictionist anti-immigration statements, attacked immigrants, proposed and supported anti-immigrant ammendments and all this with the foundation of his positive public image, integrity and moral uprightness. We are thus not discussing the list he is on, but are simply taking note of the Senator's credibility on an issue that affects us. Anything beyond that would be inappropriate and not relevant to our issues.
It has limited relevance, the issue is the integrity of the Senator, he has admitted to the issue at hand but he went on the Senate floor as an elected public official to make declaratory and restrictionist anti-immigration statements, attacked immigrants, proposed and supported anti-immigrant ammendments and all this with the foundation of his positive public image, integrity and moral uprightness. We are thus not discussing the list he is on, but are simply taking note of the Senator's credibility on an issue that affects us. Anything beyond that would be inappropriate and not relevant to our issues.
wallpaper Ghost Trick
zCool
07-18 11:25 PM
This is a simple and straightforward case.
Rules are: You are allowed to change the company but you should be in "same or similar" position.
Your new company will have to agree to continue to support the existing green card process i.e. they may have to give employment verification letter if and when asked by USCIS..
All in all I think you are in the safe..
Rules are: You are allowed to change the company but you should be in "same or similar" position.
Your new company will have to agree to continue to support the existing green card process i.e. they may have to give employment verification letter if and when asked by USCIS..
All in all I think you are in the safe..
chanukya
06-05 04:06 PM
Please keep blogging
2011 It#39;s fun to have a quot;daily
tanyas_21
11-26 12:31 AM
Hi :
I had applied for H1 when from india apil 2007, and in may 2007 i entered US on H4. My h1 got approved in aug 2007 asking me to get the stamping done from india. My consultant applied for H1 amendment on sep 21 2007. Its 8 weeks now, still not got any reply from INS.
1. I would like to know,how long does it generally take for h1 B amendment process.
2. Since the amendment is taking a long, can i go to mexico and re-enter
Regards,
Tanya
I had applied for H1 when from india apil 2007, and in may 2007 i entered US on H4. My h1 got approved in aug 2007 asking me to get the stamping done from india. My consultant applied for H1 amendment on sep 21 2007. Its 8 weeks now, still not got any reply from INS.
1. I would like to know,how long does it generally take for h1 B amendment process.
2. Since the amendment is taking a long, can i go to mexico and re-enter
Regards,
Tanya
more...
chapper
07-18 08:38 AM
I agree with Clockwork - PD is your labor filing date and not approval date. Good Luck.
illusions
03-24 11:36 AM
sent u a PM, hope it helps.
more...
chanduv23
02-02 08:52 AM
Is there any list of H-1B sponsers who can sponser H1 for Dentist ?
Lot of dentists maintain legal status by using Kaplan Visa ie they register for courses in Kaplan coaching and get i 20 from them. Guess u need get hold of these folks in their user forums, you may get a route how h1b sponsership works out.
Lot of dentists maintain legal status by using Kaplan Visa ie they register for courses in Kaplan coaching and get i 20 from them. Guess u need get hold of these folks in their user forums, you may get a route how h1b sponsership works out.
2010 just a funny trick from
SGP
12-16 06:08 AM
Anyone heard of this? Some people can individually claim greencards for extraordinary circumstances. I wonder if our force of numbers waiting extraordinarily long might enable a private bill to succeed. Here is a news item:
Rare immigration bills pass Congress (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/12/15/national/a161850S17.DTL)
Sounds Interesting.
__________________________________________________ ______________________
If you will be benefited by “I-485 filing without current priority Date”, please vote YES on the Poll.
Then please send an email to ivcoordinator@gmail.com with subject - "I485 filing without current PD - Impacted Member". Include your 1) IV username 2) Email address 3) Ph#, 4) State of Residence so that grassroot efforts can be coordinated. Please refer to the first post on the thread and use the flier,talk to your friends/colleagues to spread the message.We need all members to get involved.
Rare immigration bills pass Congress (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/12/15/national/a161850S17.DTL)
Sounds Interesting.
__________________________________________________ ______________________
If you will be benefited by “I-485 filing without current priority Date”, please vote YES on the Poll.
Then please send an email to ivcoordinator@gmail.com with subject - "I485 filing without current PD - Impacted Member". Include your 1) IV username 2) Email address 3) Ph#, 4) State of Residence so that grassroot efforts can be coordinated. Please refer to the first post on the thread and use the flier,talk to your friends/colleagues to spread the message.We need all members to get involved.
more...
ABC of GC
04-03 01:50 PM
Thank you,
hair These are not trick questions,
kgb
06-02 12:47 AM
Hi, This is my first time here. I have been hearing a lot about H1-extensions facing challenges. One of my friends, who is a consultant has got his H1-extended only for a the next 6 months. I understood from him that his client manager was called and asked how long his project will last and since the answer was, "6 months as of now, and longer if the market picks up", he was given the extn for 6 months. Another friend of mine who works full-time in a technology company has got his H1 extended for 3 years. My question: Has any of you(if you are a consultant) got your visa extended for 3 years, or do you know of a consultant who has got his visa extended for 3 years in the last few months. I know, that consultants face a lot of scrutiny, but wanted to confirm if for all of them, the extensions are limited.
more...
raysaikat
07-26 01:52 PM
...
I got extended until September 30, 2010.
...
Thanks
No, you do not need to go out of US if the I-797 (H1-B approval) comes with an I-94 card.
I got extended until September 30, 2010.
...
Thanks
No, you do not need to go out of US if the I-797 (H1-B approval) comes with an I-94 card.
hot A trick question for Raymond
raj76
05-08 12:03 PM
This may sound strange but, here is my situation. I'm currently on EAD and my I-94 expired last year after i got my EAD. Does this have any impact on my EAD renewal????:confused:
more...
house Trick Question Brain Teasers
malet
06-02 10:33 AM
Hello, I'm new to this forum. Please don't be tough on me.
I received the folowing letter from NVC. The case is for my dad. He originally filed under F4, priority date 13Jul2000.
What does it mean and what we should do?
Many thanks.
===========================================
Dear Sir/Madam:
Your inquiry has been received at the National Visa Center (NVC).
A letter was previously mailed to the Agent of Choice or Attorney of
Record requesting the amendment of previously submitted applicant forms
and/or required applicant documents that have not been submitted. The
documents listed on the letter and/or the amended forms must be
submitted to the assigned US Embassy or Consulate General at the time of
interview.
The applicant's name has been placed on the list of documentarily
qualified cases awaiting the availability of visa numbers under the
numerical limitations prescribed by statute. The designated
representative of this case (applicant, petitioner, or attorney) will be
notified of an appointment date as soon as the numbers have been
received. The applicant should NOT make any travel arrangements, sell
property, or give up employment until the US Embassy or Consulate
General has issued a visa.
An immigrant visa is usually valid for six months from the date it is
issued. It may be used to apply for admission into the United States any
time during its validity.
I received the folowing letter from NVC. The case is for my dad. He originally filed under F4, priority date 13Jul2000.
What does it mean and what we should do?
Many thanks.
===========================================
Dear Sir/Madam:
Your inquiry has been received at the National Visa Center (NVC).
A letter was previously mailed to the Agent of Choice or Attorney of
Record requesting the amendment of previously submitted applicant forms
and/or required applicant documents that have not been submitted. The
documents listed on the letter and/or the amended forms must be
submitted to the assigned US Embassy or Consulate General at the time of
interview.
The applicant's name has been placed on the list of documentarily
qualified cases awaiting the availability of visa numbers under the
numerical limitations prescribed by statute. The designated
representative of this case (applicant, petitioner, or attorney) will be
notified of an appointment date as soon as the numbers have been
received. The applicant should NOT make any travel arrangements, sell
property, or give up employment until the US Embassy or Consulate
General has issued a visa.
An immigrant visa is usually valid for six months from the date it is
issued. It may be used to apply for admission into the United States any
time during its validity.
tattoo A Trick Question Every Day
rockyrock
08-03 10:00 AM
I was wondering will we get the I-485 Receipt notice directly or Lawyer or both?
more...
pictures A trick question for Raymond
ikass
06-08 12:16 PM
Hi,
Is there any news or updates on the following hearing on 06/12/08. Is there anything we could all do to make this hearing effective for supporting the bills currently on the table.
Thanks
Thursday 06/12/2008 - 11:00 AM
2237 Rayburn House Office Building
Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law
Hearing on the Need for Green Cards for Highly Skilled Workers
By Direction of the Chairman
http://judiciary.house.gov/committeestructure.aspx?committee=4
http://judiciary.house.gov/oversight.aspx?ID=452
Hon. Lofgren
Chairman
(D) California, 16th
Hon. Gutierrez
(D) Illinois, 4th
Hon. Berman
(D) California, 28th
Hon. Jackson Lee
(D) Texas, 18th
Hon. Waters
(D) California, 35th
Hon. Delahunt
(D) Massachusetts, 10th
Hon. S�nchez
(D) California, 39th
Hon. Davis
(D) Alabama , 7th
Hon. Ellison
(D) Minnesota, 5th
Hon. Weiner
(D) New York, 9th
Hon. King
Ranking Member
(R) Iowa, 5th
Hon. Gallegly
(R) California, 24th
Hon. Goodlatte
(R) Virginia, 6th
Hon. Lungren
(R) California, 3rd
Hon. Forbes
(R) Virginia, 4th
Hon. Gohmert
(R) Texas, 1st
Is there any news or updates on the following hearing on 06/12/08. Is there anything we could all do to make this hearing effective for supporting the bills currently on the table.
Thanks
Thursday 06/12/2008 - 11:00 AM
2237 Rayburn House Office Building
Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law
Hearing on the Need for Green Cards for Highly Skilled Workers
By Direction of the Chairman
http://judiciary.house.gov/committeestructure.aspx?committee=4
http://judiciary.house.gov/oversight.aspx?ID=452
Hon. Lofgren
Chairman
(D) California, 16th
Hon. Gutierrez
(D) Illinois, 4th
Hon. Berman
(D) California, 28th
Hon. Jackson Lee
(D) Texas, 18th
Hon. Waters
(D) California, 35th
Hon. Delahunt
(D) Massachusetts, 10th
Hon. S�nchez
(D) California, 39th
Hon. Davis
(D) Alabama , 7th
Hon. Ellison
(D) Minnesota, 5th
Hon. Weiner
(D) New York, 9th
Hon. King
Ranking Member
(R) Iowa, 5th
Hon. Gallegly
(R) California, 24th
Hon. Goodlatte
(R) Virginia, 6th
Hon. Lungren
(R) California, 3rd
Hon. Forbes
(R) Virginia, 4th
Hon. Gohmert
(R) Texas, 1st
dresses These are not trick questions.
prom2
07-26 08:28 PM
According to , just 1 receipt on Jul 26, no receipts on 25 and just 2 on 24...
more...
makeup funny tricky questions
Blog Feeds
08-31 09:40 AM
ICE officials provided a copy of a new policy memo (http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/7169978.html)dated Aug. 20 that instructs government attorneys to review the court cases of people with pending applications to adjust status based on their relation to a U.S. citizen. ICE estimates in the memo that the effort could affect up to 17,000 cases.
The Department of Homeland Security is systematically reviewing thousands of pending immigration cases and moving to dismiss those filed against suspected illegal immigrants who have no serious criminal records, according to several sources familiar with the efforts.
Opponents of illegal immigration were critical of the dismissals.
"They've made clear that they have no interest in enforcing immigration laws against people who are not convicted criminals," said Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for strict controls.
In a June 30 memo, ICE Assistant Secretary John Morton outlined the agency's priorities, saying it had the capacity to remove about 400,000 illegal immigrants annually � about 4 percent of the estimated illegal immigrant population in the country. The memo outlines priorities for the detention and removal system, putting criminals and threats to national security at the top of the list.
We expect more cases terminations across the United States in the next several months.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/08/san_diego_deportation_lawyer_1.html)
The Department of Homeland Security is systematically reviewing thousands of pending immigration cases and moving to dismiss those filed against suspected illegal immigrants who have no serious criminal records, according to several sources familiar with the efforts.
Opponents of illegal immigration were critical of the dismissals.
"They've made clear that they have no interest in enforcing immigration laws against people who are not convicted criminals," said Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for strict controls.
In a June 30 memo, ICE Assistant Secretary John Morton outlined the agency's priorities, saying it had the capacity to remove about 400,000 illegal immigrants annually � about 4 percent of the estimated illegal immigrant population in the country. The memo outlines priorities for the detention and removal system, putting criminals and threats to national security at the top of the list.
We expect more cases terminations across the United States in the next several months.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/08/san_diego_deportation_lawyer_1.html)
girlfriend group Unanswerable+funny+
pappu
01-10 10:37 AM
It is a good opportunity for state chapters. Unfortunately not many state chapters are yet formed despite having 8000+ members. We have members from every state but only a handful state members are actively working. Unless we all ourselves take responsibility and actively organize and participate in state chapters it is tough to use the grassroots level strength of this organization. We have more than a thousand members coming everyday to this site and posting ideas, opinions and what IV should do and what IV should not do. We all can achieve everything easily if everyone actively makes their state chapters alive and participate. If you feel that there is nobody in your chapter, then take a lead role and organize it. If you find that few members have signed up, and nothing is happening, then PM all those that are signed up and start working on action items.
pls use this link to sign up and start taking active role in your state chapter today
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?p=30164#post30164
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=17
pls use this link to sign up and start taking active role in your state chapter today
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?p=30164#post30164
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=17
hairstyles Trick Ball
abhicyber
10-22 10:26 PM
Hi,
Any idea how long does it take to get AP approved after a soft LUD on AP?
I485/AP/EAD - NSC - Notice date 8/16/07.
FP: Done 09/29
EAD: Waiting
AP: Waiting (Soft LUD 10/22)
Thank you in advance.
AB
Any idea how long does it take to get AP approved after a soft LUD on AP?
I485/AP/EAD - NSC - Notice date 8/16/07.
FP: Done 09/29
EAD: Waiting
AP: Waiting (Soft LUD 10/22)
Thank you in advance.
AB
krishnam70
05-07 12:45 PM
USCIS Revises Filing Instructions and Direct Mail Program for the Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card (Form I-90)
WASHINGTON � U.S. Citizenship and Immigrations Services (USCIS) published a Federal Register notice on April 28, 2009 that changed the filing location and filing instructions for the Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card (Form I-90). The revised filing instructions require applicants to submit supporting documentation with their applications. Prior to this change, applicants were instructed to bring their supporting documentation to their biometrics appointments. The notice also revises the Direct Mail address for the Form I-90. Applicants must now file their Form I-90 and supporting documentation with the USCIS Lockbox facility in Phoenix.
This change in filing location affects all I-90 applicants filing a paper form, including those applicants filing the I-90 because their previously issued card was never received or because their existing card has incorrect data due to a USCIS error. This notice does not affect applicants filing an I-90 electronically or whose place of residence is outside the United States.
Beginning on April 28, 2009, applicants must submit their Form I-90 and supporting documentation to the USCIS Lockbox facility in Phoenix for initial processing, using the following addresses:
USCIS
P.O. Box 21262
Phoenix, AZ 85036
For USPS Express Mail and Courier Service deliveries, use the following address:
USCIS
ATTN: I-90
1820 Skyharbor Circle S Floor 1
Phoenix. AZ 85034
WASHINGTON � U.S. Citizenship and Immigrations Services (USCIS) published a Federal Register notice on April 28, 2009 that changed the filing location and filing instructions for the Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card (Form I-90). The revised filing instructions require applicants to submit supporting documentation with their applications. Prior to this change, applicants were instructed to bring their supporting documentation to their biometrics appointments. The notice also revises the Direct Mail address for the Form I-90. Applicants must now file their Form I-90 and supporting documentation with the USCIS Lockbox facility in Phoenix.
This change in filing location affects all I-90 applicants filing a paper form, including those applicants filing the I-90 because their previously issued card was never received or because their existing card has incorrect data due to a USCIS error. This notice does not affect applicants filing an I-90 electronically or whose place of residence is outside the United States.
Beginning on April 28, 2009, applicants must submit their Form I-90 and supporting documentation to the USCIS Lockbox facility in Phoenix for initial processing, using the following addresses:
USCIS
P.O. Box 21262
Phoenix, AZ 85036
For USPS Express Mail and Courier Service deliveries, use the following address:
USCIS
ATTN: I-90
1820 Skyharbor Circle S Floor 1
Phoenix. AZ 85034
ngarugs
02-09 08:36 PM
"Senate leadership is comfortable with a proposal to solve retrogression for Schedule A occupation -- registered nurses and physical therapists. It was through grassroots advocacy that we were able to explain to the Senate leadership just how important this issue is. Thank you to everyone who made an effort.
We now must turn our efforts toward the House."
(and goes on with....)
"Rep. Lofgren (D - CA) : 16th District - San Jose
Rep. Eshoo (D- CA) : 14th District - San Francisco, San Jose, Santa Cruz
Rep. Pelosi (D - CA) : 8th District - San Francisco and north
Essentially anyone who is located in the Bay Area and wants to see retrogression solved should contact their hospital leadership and see if they are willing to make a few phone calls" (*click HLG (http://hammondlawgroup.blogspot.com/) for details)
We now must turn our efforts toward the House."
(and goes on with....)
"Rep. Lofgren (D - CA) : 16th District - San Jose
Rep. Eshoo (D- CA) : 14th District - San Francisco, San Jose, Santa Cruz
Rep. Pelosi (D - CA) : 8th District - San Francisco and north
Essentially anyone who is located in the Bay Area and wants to see retrogression solved should contact their hospital leadership and see if they are willing to make a few phone calls" (*click HLG (http://hammondlawgroup.blogspot.com/) for details)